EMR access here

EMR Vendor access here

EMR News access here

Electronic Medical Records access here

<P><A href="http://www.emrworld.net/" title="Electronic Medical Records">Electronic Medical Records</A> is here</P>

EMR - Electronic Medical Records

Electronic Medical Records Inc.

Adding value to healthcare !!

  Home EMR Vendors EMR Research EMR News Contact Us  
 
EMR Research

    * EMR Research
    * Research Listing
    * Submit Article
    * EHR
    * PHR
    * CCR
    * CDA
    * CCOW
    * HL7
    * Trade Journals
    * Trade Shows
    * Books
    * Facts & Figures
   
 
Quick Links

    * EMR Home
    * EMR Vendors
    * EMR News
    * EMR Research
    * EMR Specialty
    * Organizations
    * Technology
    * Global Presence
    * EMR Forum
    * Search Site
    * EMR Jobs
    * EMR Glossary
    * About EMR
    * Contact Us

EMR

EMR
Market Failure And The Creation Of A National Health Information Technology System.

EMR >> EMR Research

Legal Status And Electronic Health Insurance Among Immigrants.

Clinical Context Object Working Group (CCOW)

Electronic Medical Records - CCOW

If you wish to submit an article, please click on EMR Research Article Submitter

Aimed at facilitating the integration of applications at the point of use, CCOW is an end-user-focused standard that complements HL7’s traditional emphasis on data interchange and enterprise workflow. Using a technique known as context management, the clinical user’s experience is one of interacting with a single system, when in fact he or she may be using multiple, independent applications from many different systems, each via its native user interface.

By synchronizing and coordinating applications so that they automatically follow the user’s context, the CCOW Standard serves as the basis for ensuring secure and consistent access to patient information from heterogeneous sources. The benefits include applications that are easier to use, increased utilization of electronically available information, and an increase in patient safety. Further, CCOW support for secure context management provides a healthcare standards basis for addressing HIPAA requirements. For example, CCOW enables the deployment of highly secure single sign-on solutions.

Impact
CCOW’s impact on the healthcare industry is apparent. Leslie Kelly Hall, CIO of St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center described what CCOW has meant for her organization. “It's difficult to overstate the significance of this breakthrough because it means physicians finally have intuitive access to the entire breadth and depth of clinical information.”
All of the major HIS vendors are now shipping or planning on shipping both Windows- and Web-based CCOW-compliant applications, while vendors in virtually every segment of the clinical healthcare market have adopted the standard as well. VHA Inc.—a nationwide network of 1,900 leading community-owned healthcare organizations and their affiliated institutions—now requires all of its new business partners to be CCOW-compliant. A growing number of healthcare organizations are also implementing context management solutions to link together diverse multi-vendor, multi-technology IT systems on an enterprise-wide basis.

How It Works
The CCOW Technical Committee became a part of HL7 two years ago after starting out as an independent healthcare industry consortium. In that short time, the committee has developed and ratified four versions of the CCOW Standard. This unprecedented pace has been, in part, due to the modular component-based nature of the architecture upon which the standard is based, enabling new specifications to be developed in a complementary and add-on manner.

CCOW’s Context Management Architecture (CMA) was founded on the principle that common context can be estab¬lished across applications by identifying things—such as a patient—or concepts—such as a clinical encounter—in a manner that different applications can never¬theless recognize.

The core architecture is comprised of three main types of components: applications; a context manager that coordinates and synchronizes applications; and mapping agents that can represent the various synonymous real-world identifiers used to identify clinical patients, users, etc. The architecture defines the roles and responsibilities for each of these components and precisely prescribes the interfaces that enable them to communicate. The architecture does not define or dictate the implementation of any of the components.
The user sets the context using any CCOW-compliant application, for example, to select a patient of interest. The application then tells the context manager that it wants to set the patient context and provides the context manager with an identifier that indicates the context subject, which, in this case, might be the medical record number for the patient of interest.
The context manager then tells the other applications that the context has been changed, and each application obtains the patient’s identifier from the context manager. Each application then adjusts its internal state and data display accordingly. This all happens in real-time.

Detailed How It Works
The user sets the context using any CCOW-compliant application—for example, he or she selects a patient of interest. The application then tells the CCOW-compliant context manager that it wants to set the patient context, and provides this context manager with an identifier that indicates the context subject, which in this case might be the medical record number for the patient of interest. The context manager then notifies the other applications that the context has been changed, and each application obtains the patient’s identifier from the context manager. Each application then adjusts its internal state and data display accordingly.

Context links may be common or secure. Any application may set or get the context data for a common link. In contrast, only site-designated applications may set and/or get the context data for a secure link. Applications, the context manager and mapping agents use digital signatures to authenticate the messages they send and receive and to ensure the integrity of the data within these messages.

The basic idea is to provide a means for the various CCOW components to trust each other, for example, to enable applications to know that they are communicating with the real context manager (as opposed to a rogue application that is pretending to be a context manager).

One of the more elegant capabilities provided by the architecture is that the use of different context subject identifiers is hidden from applications. An application only needs to know its own identifiers. A mapping agent works in conjunction with the context manager to map the identifiers used by the application that sets the context to identifiers that may be understood by other context-sharing applica¬tions. For example, one application may use a hospital-assigned medical record number to identify patients, while another application in the same institution uses clinic-assigned medical record numbers to identify the same patients.

The CCOW architecture was designed to be easily implemented within all types of health care applications and using a variety of technologies. Particular emphasis was given to ensuring that CCOW compliance could be easily retrofitted into existing applications. It is not necessary for an application developer to implement a context manager or mapping agents, as these components are external to the application can be obtained from other sources.

Source: http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/sigvi/ccow_overview_2001.doc


* EMR

* EHR

* PHR

* CCR

 

Advertise | Continuity of Care Records | EMR Vendor | EMR Forum | Vendor Rating | Subscribe | EMR Software | EMR Jobs | EMR Glossary

About Us |  Disclaimer & TOS | Accessibility Statement | EMR Fact & Figures | Electronic Medical Records

© 2005-06 Electronic Medical Records All rights reserved. SiteMap

Contact us via: info@emrworld.net